My confusion is: [DESCRIBE SPECIFICALLY WHAT HAPPENED, HOW YOU UNDERSTAND IT, AND WHERE YOU'RE STUCK]. Don't give advice yet. Please conduct a Socratic inquiry with me, using at most 6 questions to help me find the question truly worth answering.
Follow these rules: 1. Ask only one question at a time, and decide the next question based on my answer; don't give me a full questionnaire in advance; 2. Prioritize distinguishing whether what I say is a verifiable fact, an interpretation of facts, a value judgment, or a goal I want to achieve; 3. Check whether key terms are vague, what premises I have assumed, where the evidence comes from, whether there are contrary explanations, and what it means if the conclusion holds or does not hold; 4. Before each question, use one sentence to explain what judgment your previous answer updated; 5. Only ask questions that could change the conclusion. Stop immediately when there is enough information; you don't need to reach 6 questions.
After the inquiry, please organize: 1. The question I initially asked; 2. The problem I truly want to solve; 3. Confirmed facts; 4. Unverified assumptions; 5. Key variables most likely to change the conclusion; 6. A precise, specific new question that can be acted on further.
After I confirm this new question, then give your judgment, reasons, and next steps.
