My question is: [FILL IN THE QUESTION, KNOWN FACTS, GOALS, AND PRACTICAL CONSTRAINTS].
First, do not give me a solution directly. Please choose 3 genuinely complementary professional perspectives for this problem, and explain why each perspective is necessary.
Have each perspective answer separately: 1. How does it redefine this problem; 2. Its most recommended solution path; 3. What risks the other perspectives are most likely to overlook; 4. What new evidence would make it change its judgment.
Then have the three perspectives challenge one another, identifying: 1. Facts they all agree on; 2. Genuine disagreements; 3. The different assumptions behind those disagreements.
Finally, provide a synthesized output: 1. The most recommended plan after synthesis; 2. Applicable conditions; 3. The biggest risk; 4. Exit conditions; 5. The first step of action.
Do not choose three highly similar identities, and do not imitate or fabricate the views of real people. If information is insufficient, first ask me only one most critical question.
